双城记读后感怎么写？( 二 )

In arguably the book\\'s first touching scene (some say it\\'s the one where Carton is on his way to the guillotine), Lucie goes through much trouble to coax her father from his insanity, laying her head on his shoulder, and trusting a man she had never met.When Madame Defarge sought vengeance for the cruel injustice committed against her kin, she looked to destroy not only the innocent descendent of the culprit, but his family-- an old man, a young woman, and a little girl.These two characters\\' love and hate are unconditional and total.Did this have to be so? Could not Madame Defarge have showed one bit of femininity, of human kindne? Could Lucie not have stolen a contemptuous glance at her persecutors? Not with Dickens at the helm.Lucie and Defarge are created with a conviction, and once Dickens\\' plot was laid, the blinders he put on his characters allowed only one route.Perhaps it was a primitive style, but modern characters are painted more realistically, with human weaknees and more variability.Did it have to be so? Could Dickens have captured more readers, especially in the long run, if he had pursued more varying actions in his characters, as well as more humanne and believability? Does this point to Dickens as a flawed writer, with little imagination and ability?
【双城记读后感怎么写？】Another factor that must be considered is our inability to criticize an English--or English-living--character, or to find a modicum of res
pectability in a French one, with two exceptions.One is the young woman who is beheaded just before Sydney Carton.She is the enemy of an enemy, she is going to be killed, and she allows Dickens to teach another moral using Sydney Carton.Why not have her happy to die for the benefit of her countrymen, while not trembling as she ascends to her death, thereby depriving the common enemy of a small victory? With the modern trend of political correctne and anti-racism, a Tale of Two Cities written today would never leave the word proceor.Jerry Cruncher is about the most sinful of the English (aside from a spy but, remember, he defected to France), and he repents by the end, which counts for another moral from Dickens.In Dickens\\' time, racism was not regarded as it is today, and so if he wanted to use the French Revolution to send a meage to the population, it was his right, but he may have taken this too far for some.
Today, Lucie Manette would by no means be taken seriously as a believable, even likable character.She persists in fainting at particularly streful moments, but when her husband is before a heartle, bloodthirsty jury, she looks brave and strong just for him.In context, this was a screaming contradiction, but one that Dickens required to portray his Eve.It is much easier to believe Madame Defarge\\'s hate than her opposition\\'s love.Defarge\\'s sister was raped and
murdered mercilely and her brother was killed by a pair heartle "noblemen".It is much easier to understand Defarge\\'s taste for blood than the condition of Manette, who, after practicing as a competent doctor and acting normally for years, experiences a recurrence of his mental condition simply because his wonderful daughter has left for two weeks, although he has two dear friends nearby.